Why Indigenous Reserves Struggle in Canada

Canada forced Indigenous peoples onto reserves and denied them equal rights. The legacy of broken treaties and abuse still defines inequality today.

Learning from a Troubled Past

Photo by Divina Clark on Unsplash

When we ask why Indigenous reserves across Canada face so many difficulties, we are not asking a simple question about poverty or infrastructure. We are asking how a country built itself by displacing and restricting its first peoples. The story of reserves is a story of broken promises, forced isolation, and deliberate policies of control that continue to shape lives today.

Reserves were not gifts from a benevolent government. They were tools of containment. Indigenous nations that had lived on and cared for their lands for thousands of years were moved aside so White settlers could farm, mine, and build railways. The land they were forced onto was often remote, less fertile, and cut off from economic opportunities. In many cases, the very treaties that were supposed to protect Indigenous rights became instruments of dispossession.

The Treaty Process and Its Broken Promises

Treaties are often spoken of as agreements that granted land to Indigenous peoples. In reality, the opposite is true. The Numbered Treaties, signed between 1871 and 1921 across the Prairies, northern Ontario, and parts of the North, were negotiated when settlers and the Canadian state sought to expand westward. First Nations leaders entered negotiations believing they were sharing land in exchange for support tools for farming, education for their children, and protection of their traditional ways of life.

Unfortunately, the Canadian government approached treaties differently. It saw them as transactions that extinguished Indigenous land rights in exchange for small parcels of reserve land and minimal annual payments. Promises such as agricultural support were often delivered late, in poor quality, or not at all. Treaty payments, fixed at five dollars per person, have never been adjusted for inflation. A payment that might have meant something in 1875 is today an insult.

Some nations never signed treaties at all. Large parts of British Columbia remain “unceded territory,” meaning Indigenous peoples there never surrendered their lands through treaty or military defeat. Still, settlers occupied these territories regardless, leaving unresolved questions of sovereignty that continue to this day. Court rulings such as the 1997 “Delgamuukw” decision affirmed that Aboriginal title still exists where it was never ceded, but the struggle to enforce these rights is ongoing.

The Residential School System as Cultural Genocide

Any discussion of reserves must also acknowledge the devastating impact of residential schools. From the late nineteenth century until the final school closed in 1996, more than 150,000 Indigenous children were taken from their families and placed in institutions designed to “kill the Indian in the child.”

These schools, run largely by churches but funded by the federal government, stripped children of their languages, ceremonies, and cultural identities. They were punished for speaking their mother tongues, forced to adopt European dress and names, and subjected to military-style discipline. Abuse was widespread, physical, emotional, and sexual. Thousands of children never returned home, their deaths undocumented or deliberately hidden.

The intergenerational trauma is immeasurable. Parents were robbed of the ability to raise their children, and children grew up alienated from their families and communities. Survivors left schools carrying deep scars, struggling with depression, addiction, and loss of identity. When critics ask why reserves face such challenges today, the answer cannot ignore this systematic attack on the family unit itself.

The Truth and Reconciliation Commission, which documented thousands of survivor testimonies, concluded that the residential school system amounted to cultural genocide. Its 94 Calls to Action are a roadmap for change, but progress has been uneven, and many promises remain unfulfilled.

Court Battles for Rights and Recognition

The injustice of the reserve system has also played out in Canada’s courts. Indigenous peoples have repeatedly been forced to defend rights that were supposed to have been guaranteed.

In 1973, the “Calder v. British Columbia” decision marked a turning point by acknowledging that Aboriginal title existed before colonization and still exists unless explicitly extinguished. This recognition forced the federal government to begin negotiating modern land claims, leading to agreements such as the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement in 1975 and the Nisga’a Treaty in 1999.

The 1999 “Marshall” decision affirmed the Mi’kmaq right to fish for a “moderate livelihood” under eighteenth-century treaties, sparking conflicts with commercial fisheries that continue today. The 2014 “Tsilhqot’in” decision went even further, recognizing Aboriginal title to a specific tract of land in British Columbia. These cases highlight how the courts have become battlegrounds where Indigenous nations fight for promises that should have been honoured without litigation.

However, court victories do not erase the decades of underfunding, neglect, and mistrust that reserves face. Nor do they solve the daily struggles of families living without clean water, safe housing, or meaningful economic opportunities.

The Weight of Modern Barriers

Even as court decisions strengthen Indigenous rights, reserves remain constrained by structural barriers. Because reserve land is held collectively by the Crown, individuals cannot use property as collateral for mortgages or business loans. Banks routinely refuse to lend, preventing entrepreneurs from building the kinds of businesses that could support local economies.

Infrastructure is another major challenge. Dozens of communities have lived under boil-water advisories for decades, even while neighbouring municipalities enjoy safe drinking water. When resources such as pipelines or dams are built, they often run through Indigenous territories, endangering water, wildlife, and livelihoods. Consent is rarely sought in meaningful ways. Instead, governments continue the pattern of imposing projects first and dealing with the consequences later.

Governance and Responsibility

Critics sometimes claim that corruption within band councils is to blame for poor conditions on reserves. While mismanagement exists in certain places, it is not the defining feature of Indigenous governance. Most leaders work under impossible conditions, forced to stretch inadequate federal transfers across communities with complex needs. Moreover, the federal bureaucracy maintains control over many aspects of reserve life, limiting self-determination.

Jurisdictional confusion worsens the situation. Reserves are federally administered, but provinces deliver many essential services such as healthcare and education. This has created gaps where responsibility falls through the cracks. A famous example is the case of Jordan River Anderson, a Cree boy from Manitoba who died in hospital while governments argued over who should pay for his care. The resulting “Jordan’s Principle” is supposed to ensure that no Indigenous child is denied services due to jurisdictional disputes, but its uneven application shows how deep the problem runs.

Learning to Respond with Justice

The hardships facing reserves are not the result of cultural shortcomings or personal failures. They are the predictable outcome of policies that deliberately disempowered Indigenous peoples and continue to constrain them today. The treaties were broken, the schools were abusive, and the courts are still needed to win rights that should never have been denied.

Fortunately, there are examples of hope. When the Tsawwassen First Nation in British Columbia gained greater sovereignty through a modern treaty in 2009, they were able to build their own water system. Clean drinking water, denied for more than a century, became a reality almost overnight. This shows what happens when Indigenous communities are given authority over their own futures.

Moving Forward Together

The way forward begins with truth. Canadians must accept that reserves were never gifts. They were part of a strategy of removal and containment. Reconciliation cannot be reduced to apologies or symbolic gestures. It must involve honouring treaties, removing barriers to development, ensuring clean water and housing, and respecting Indigenous sovereignty.

For readers, this means learning about the treaties that cover the land where you live. Supporting Indigenous businesses and voices and holding governments accountable for fulfilling long-overdue promises.

Canada’s strength will not be diminished by justice. A nation that respects its first peoples and honours its word becomes one that all its citizens can be proud of. The reserves that struggle today are not inevitable.

If this deepened your understanding, please like and share it. Subscribe for a paid subscription to support free articles in an increasingly difficult algorithm environment, or buy me a coffee to help sustain independent writing. Together, we can keep these stories alive and ensure they are no longer ignored.

Alberta Separation Meets Its Treaty Reckoning

“Wokeness” Is Not the Threat

Unmasking Racism in Canada