What Happened to the NDP? How It Lost Its Way

Explore the NDP’s decline to a marginalized party. Can it reconnect with its working-class roots and regain its place in Canadian politics?

What Happened to the NDP?

New Democratic Party (NDP) by AI

The New Democratic Party (NDP) was once a formidable force in Canadian politics, championing workers' rights, social democracy, and a vision of equity that resonated with middle-class and blue-collar voters alike. But in recent years, the party has stagnated, lost ground to the Liberals, and failed to capitalize on growing discontent with Trudeau’s government. The NDP was founded on the promise of a working-class coalition, yet under its current leadership, it has drifted further from its roots.

What happened to the NDP? Why has it failed to mount a serious challenge for power? And more importantly, how can it rebuild?

Jack Layton’s Legacy and the NDP’s Identity Crisis

Jack Layton’s tenure as leader marked the NDP’s most successful era. His charisma, pragmatism, and unwavering commitment to progressive policies propelled the party to an unprecedented 103 seats in 2011, making it the Official Opposition for the first time in its history. Layton connected with working-class voters and left-leaning Canadians who saw him as an alternative to the political establishment. His leadership was built on the idea that the NDP could not only be a protest party but a government-in-waiting.

After Layton’s passing, the NDP struggled to find a leader who could maintain that momentum. Thomas Mulcair was an effective House leader but lacked Layton’s warmth and vision. In 2015, he shifted the party toward fiscal centrism, attempting to appear more "electable" but instead alienating progressive voters. The result was devastating: the NDP collapsed from 103 seats to 44, allowing Trudeau’s Liberals to sweep into power.

Jagmeet Singh entered the scene in 2017 with a fresh image and a promise to rejuvenate the party. However, his leadership has been defined more by symbolic gestures than by the bold, strategic decision-making required to make the NDP a serious contender.

A Party More Comfortable Losing Than Winning

The fundamental problem with today’s NDP is that it does not seem interested in winning power.

Internally, the party is dominated by insular networks of staff and consultants who are more focused on maintaining ideological purity than building a broad, working-class coalition. They are not interested in attracting new voters, engaging with diverse perspectives, or expanding beyond their university-educated, urban progressive base. They exist in an echo chamber, convinced of their righteousness, but blind to the reality that politics is about persuasion, coalition-building, and, ultimately, governing.

Instead of forging a path to victory, the NDP has settled into a familiar role: acting as a pressure group within Parliament rather than a serious alternative to the governing Liberals or opposition Conservatives. It has become content playing the role of the conscience of Parliament: pushing policies like dental care while failing to demand meaningful labour reforms that would empower unionized workers.

This reluctance to fight for power is a betrayal of the party’s origins. The NDP was built by working-class Canadians, particularly federal union members who co-founded the party alongside the Cooperative Commonwealth Federation (CCF). Today, those same union members feel abandoned, watching as the party focuses more on symbolic battles than on addressing their material concerns.

The NDP’s Labour Problem: A Missed Opportunity

The most baffling failure of the modern NDP is its inability to champion the rights of federal workers, many of whom should be its natural base.

Rail employees are dying due to fatigue. Air travel has become more unsafe due to deregulation. Non-unionized truck drivers are handed licenses without proper oversight. Postal workers remain underpaid. These are issues that should define the NDP’s platform. Instead, Singh’s leadership has focused on programs like dental care and minimum wage increases, important policies, but ones that do little to address the structural power imbalances faced by unionized workers.

Singh had a golden opportunity to use his leverage in Parliament to strengthen the federal labour code. Instead, he secured anti-scab legislation that looks good on paper but means little in practice when companies can simply rely on back-to-work legislation. Over the past year alone, striking unions have been legislated back to work four times. Singh’s response? Criticizing Trudeau and moving on.

A serious NDP leader would have fought for legislation that empowered unions at the bargaining table, forcing corporations to comply with fair contracts rather than pushing workers into strikes they cannot win. Instead, federal union members have watched their right to strike erode while the NDP remains silent.

The consequence of this neglect is clear: union members are increasingly turning to the Conservatives. If their right to strike is meaningless because they will be legislated back to work regardless, why vote for a party that offers them nothing but empty rhetoric? Many are choosing the party that promises lower taxes and economic growth instead.

Where Does the NDP Go From Here?

The NDP is at a crossroads. If it continues on its current path, it will remain a marginal player, useful to prop up Liberal governments but never able to form one of its own. If it wants to be taken seriously as a contender for power, it needs to make fundamental changes.

The party must reconnect with its working-class roots. That means prioritizing labour rights, fighting for federal workers, and advocating for policies that improve conditions for the people who built this party in the first place. It must break free from the insular culture that has made it complacent, welcoming diverse perspectives rather than shutting them out. It must show voters that it is not merely a left-wing think tank but a party that can govern.

There are still promising figures within the NDP. Wab Kinew in Manitoba has demonstrated how progressive leadership can be both firm and compassionate, resonating with working-class voters. Charlie Angus in Ontario has shown that a leader can fight hard without abandoning Canadian civility. The party needs more leaders like them, leaders who respond to the current moment with urgency and vision.

The path forward is clear. The question is whether the NDP dares to take it.

If you found this analysis insightful, consider supporting independent writing. Subscribe, share this article with a friend, or buy me a coffee to help sustain this work. Your support makes in-depth, critical political analysis possible.